*24:1 A mere handful (0.5%) of the Greek manuscripts, of objectively inferior quality, omit “along with some others” (as in NIV, NASB, LB, TEV, etc.).
†24:5 ‘They’ is masculine and ‘them’ is feminine.
‡24:8 These were the women who had been providing for Jesus for some time, and they doubtless heard much of His teaching, including this statement.
§24:9 There were more people in the upper room than just the Eleven.
*24:11 They had already been ‘burned’, their hopes dashed, and were not in a hurry to be ‘taken in’ again.
†24:12 According to John's account, this had already happened earlier, so Luke gives it out of sequence.
‡24:13 Literally, ‘sixty stadia’.
§24:17 Instead of “…walk, and are gloomy?” a mere handful (0.5%) of the Greek manuscripts, of objectively inferior quality, have “…walk? And they stood gloomy.” (as in NIV, NASB, LB, TEV, etc.).
*24:18 The other person is not identified, but presumably it could have been his wife.
†24:21 They were looking for the Messianic Kingdom right then.
‡24:24 Although in verse 12 above Luke mentions only Peter, Cleopas makes clear that more than one went, as is recorded in John 20:2-10.
§24:27 He declares Himself to be the Messiah. I do wish that explanation had been recorded!
*24:28 And He would have, if they hadn't restrained Him.
†24:30 He was a guest, but He took charge.
‡24:31 They had been supernaturally hindered from recognizing Him, up to that point.
§24:32 Don't you know that was so! To this day, if Jesus talks to you, your heart burns.
*24:34 There were others in the room besides the Eleven, some near the door. So when the two burst in, all exited with their news, the others ‘prick their balloon’—“Oh, we already know about that”. Has human nature changed?
†24:36 A mere handful (0.5%) of the Greek manuscripts, of objectively inferior quality, omit “Jesus” (as in NIV, NASB, LB, TEV, etc.).
‡24:42 Less than 1% of the Greek manuscripts, of objectively inferior quality, omit “and some honeycomb” (as in NIV, NASB, LB, TEV, etc.).
§24:43 It is easy to criticize them for being so slow to believe, but would we have done any better? Note that Christ's glorified body, that could just pass through a wall, was palpable—it had flesh and bones (but perhaps not blood). The food that He ate presumably did not go through a normal process of digestion.
*24:44 The Lord recognizes the three divisions of the Old Testament.
†24:46 A mere handful (0.5%) of the Greek manuscripts, of objectively inferior quality, omit “and thus it was necessary” (as in NIV, NASB, LB, TEV, etc.).
‡24:47 The Gospel is for all nations, and it must include repentance!
§24:49 “Until you are clothed with power from on High”—what are the implications of this for us today? Without God's power, what difference can we make in this world?
*24:53 Jesus had declared that God had abandoned that temple, so why did they still go there? It was a logical place to evangelize Jews, if that was their object. It was also the largest meeting place in town, presumably. But subsequent events show clearly that they still regarded it as ‘God's house’, a special place for worshiping. I would say that this became a snare to them.
†24:53 A mere handful (0.4%) of the Greek manuscripts, of objectively inferior quality, omit “praising and” (as in NIV, NASB, LB, TEV, etc.).
‡24:53 Some 50% of the Greek manuscripts have a colophon that says, “published fifteen years after the ascension of Christ”. For 50% of the MSS to have this information probably means that the tradition is ancient. If this information is correct, then Luke was ‘published’ in 45/46 AD. The same sources have Matthew published seven years earlier (38/39) and Mark five years earlier (40/41), while John was ‘published’ thirty-two years after the ascension, or 61/62 AD. Not only were the authors eyewitnesses of the events, but many others were still alive when the Gospels appeared. They could attest to the veracity of the accounts, but could also be the source of textual variants, adding tidbits here and there, or ‘correcting’ something that they remembered differently.